NEWS: 公告在东京证券交易所JASDAQ标准市场新上市

表纸
市场调查报告书

在5G:地球上最大的展览 第15册 - 毫米波固定无线存取(点阅) (FWA) 碰了焦点的5G基准调查

5G: The Greatest Show on Earth - Volume 15, It's a Different Kind of Animal (5G Benchmark Study, with a Focus on mmWave Fixed Wireless Access [FWA])

出版商 Signals Research Group 商品编码 976177
出版日期 内容资讯 英文 67 Pages
商品交期: 最快1-2个工作天内
价格
在5G:地球上最大的展览 第15册 - 毫米波固定无线存取(点阅) (FWA) 碰了焦点的5G基准调查 5G: The Greatest Show on Earth - Volume 15, It's a Different Kind of Animal (5G Benchmark Study, with a Focus on mmWave Fixed Wireless Access [FWA])
出版日期: 2020年12月14日内容资讯: 英文 67 Pages
简介

在本报告以明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯及Saint Paul的 Verizon的网路中用高功率CPE实施的测试为基础,提供以毫米波固定无线存取(FWA) 为焦点的5G基准调查的汇整结果。

目录

第1章 摘要整理

第2章 重要发现

第3章 明尼阿波利斯的测试结果

  • PCI650测试的地方
    • 测试1测试2
    • 测试4F及测试4R
    • 测试6
    • 测试11下行链路和上行链路
    • 测试33
  • 目标丰富的环境
    • 测试12
    • 测试13测试24
    • 测试14上行链路
    • 测试16下行链路和上行链路
    • 测试17测试18
    • 测试20测试21
  • PCI 682-PCI684测试
    • 测试50
    • 测试51
    • 测试52
    • 测试53
    • 测试54
    • 测试55
    • 测试56及测试57
    • 测试58
    • 测试59

第4章 Saint Paul的测试结果

  • Summit Avenue:住宅
    • 测试70
    • 测试74
    • 测试75
    • 测试76
  • Across the River:工业
    • 测试82
    • 测试84
    • 测试85

第5章 测试调查手法

第6章 结论

目录

SRG just completed its fifteenth 5G benchmark study, this time with a focus on mmWave Fixed Wireless Access (FWA), based on testing we did with a high-power CPE in Verizon's networks in Minneapolis and Saint Paul, Minnesota.

Highlights of the Report include the following:

  • Our Thanks. We did this study in collaboration with Accuver Americas and Spirent Communications who provided us with their respective test equipment and platforms, which we identify in the report. SRG did all the testing and analysis of the data and we are solely responsible for the commentary in the report.
  • Our Methodology. We conducted stationary tests at more than 50 locations in the Twin Cities using the high-power Wistron NeWeb Corporation LRV5-100 CPE with the Qualcomm QTM527 mmWave antenna module. SRG selected the test areas and the test locations - at many locations we had no knowledge of where the 5G NR cell sites were located.
  • It's a Completely Different Animal. We documented a 25 dB advantage with the high-power CPE compared with a 5G NR smartphone. At most test locations, which involved near- or non-line-of-site conditions, and/or distances frequently between 400 and 800 meters (peak = 1.2 km), the 5G NR smartphone could not even connect to the network while the CPE achieved Gigabit-per-Second speeds - well above the promoted speed of 300 Mbps.
  • More to Come. Software upgrades from suppliers in early 2021 will further increase the effective range of mmWave, which is somewhat restricted today due to downlink/uplink interference which occurs when the distance the signal travels exceeds the capabilities of the existing TDD frame structure, which didn't anticipate the time required to travel these distances. That being said, we believe the benefits of a high-power CPE are equally applicable to achieving high throughput with near- and NLOS conditions in urban and suburban environments.
  • Going beyond eMBB. It is clear to us that we've tested in areas and stumbled upon significant deployments of 5G NR mmWave sites in other states that were solely intended for FWA. There is no reason that mmWave 5G NR can't be used outside of urban and suburban markets for FWA. Mid-band 5G NR will always have the coverage advantage, but the high-power CPE helps level the playing field. The "best spectrum" for FWA will depend on the service offering the operator promotes (speed, data caps, etc.) as well as the population density being served.
  • Availability Disconnect. We know where Verizon has mmWave FWA coverage since we had boots on the ground and test equipment in hand. Unfortunately, Verizon's online tool for determining 5G Home Internet service availability doesn't reflect the coverage we observed. Unless an address shows up in the online database, the service isn't available to the consumer. This issue needs to be addressed.

Table of Contents

1.0 Executive Summary

2.0 Key Observations

3.0 Minneapolis Test Results

  • 3.1 PCI 650 Test Locations
    • 3.1.1 Test 1 and Test 2
    • 3.1.2 Test 4F and Test 4R
    • 3.1.3 Test 6
    • 3.1.4 Test 11 Downlink and Uplink
    • 3.1.5 Test 33
  • 3.2 Target Rich Environment
    • 3.2.1 Test 12
    • 3.2.2 Test 13 and Test 24
    • 3.2.3 Test 14 Uplink
    • 3.2.4 Test 16 Downlink and Uplink
    • 3.2.5 Test 17 and Test 18
    • 3.2.6 Test 20 and Test 21
  • 3.3 PCI 682 - PCI 684 Tests
    • 3.3.1 Test 50
    • 3.3.2 Test 51
    • 3.3.3 Test 52
    • 3.3.4 Test 53
    • 3.3.5 Test 54
    • 3.3.6 Test 55
    • 3.3.7 Test 56 and Test 57
    • 3.3.8 Test 58
    • 3.3.9 Test 59

4.0 Saint Paul Test Results

  • 4.1 Summit Avenue - Residential
    • 4.1.1 Test 70
    • 4.1.2 Test 74
    • 4.1.3 Test 75
    • 4.1.4 Test 76
  • 4.2 Across the River - Industrial
    • 4.2.1 Test 82
    • 4.2.2 Test 84
    • 4.2.3 Test 85

5.0 Test Methodology

6.0 Final Thoughts

Index of Figures & Tables

  • Figure 1. Minneapolis Test Area
  • Figure 2. Saint Paul Test Area
  • Figure 3. Smartphone BRSRP versus CPE BRSRP at Select Test Location
  • Figure 4. BRSRP versus Throughput
  • Figure 5. Cell Site Distance versus Throughput
  • Figure 6. Minneapolis Test Locations
  • Figure 7. Additional Minneapolis Test Results
  • Figure 8. PCI 650 Test Locations
  • Figure 9. Test 1 KPIs
  • Figure 10. Test 2 KPIs
  • Figure 11. Test 4F KPIs
  • Figure 12. Test 4R KPIs
  • Figure 13. Test 6 View
  • Figure 14. Test 6 KPIs
  • Figure 15. Test 11 View
  • Figure 16. Test 11 KPIs
  • Figure 17. Test 11 Uplink KPIs
  • Figure 18. Test 33 View
  • Figure 19. Test 33 KPIs
  • Figure 20. Target Rich Environment Test Locations
  • Figure 21. Test 12 View
  • Figure 22. Test 12 KPIs
  • Figure 23. Test 13 View
  • Figure 24. Test 13 KPIs
  • Figure 25. Test 24 View
  • Figure 26. Test 24 KPIs
  • Figure 29. Test 14 View
  • Figure 30. Test 14 KPIs
  • Figure 31. Test 16 View
  • Figure 32. Test 16 KPIs
  • Figure 33. Test 16 Uplink KPIs
  • Figure 34. Test 18 View
  • Figure 35. Test 18 KPIs
  • Figure 36. Test 17 KPIs
  • Figure 37. Test 21 View
  • Figure 38. Test 21 KPIs
  • Figure 39. Test 20 KPIs
  • Figure 40. PCI 682 - PCI 684 Test Locations
  • Figure 41. Test 50 View
  • Figure 42. Test 50 KPIs
  • Figure 43. Test 51 View
  • Figure 44. Test 51 KPIs
  • Figure 45. Test 52 View
  • Figure 46. Test 52 KPIs
  • Figure 47. Test 53 View
  • Figure 48. Test 53 KPIs
  • Figure 49. Test 54 View
  • Figure 50. Test 54 KPIs
  • Figure 51. Test 55 View
  • Figure 52. Test 55 KPIs
  • Figure 53. Test 56 KPIs
  • Figure 54. Test 57 KPIs
  • Figure 55. Test 58 View
  • Figure 56. Test 58 KPIs
  • Figure 57. Test 59 View
  • Figure 58 .Test 59 Downlink Throughput Time Series Plot
  • Figure 59. Test 59 Uplink Throughput Time Series Plot
  • Figure 60. Test 59 Uplink KPIs
  • Figure 61. Saint Paul Test Locations
  • Figure 62. Additional Saint Paul Test Results
  • Figure 63. Summit Avenue Test Locations
  • Figure 64. Summit Avenue Cell Site
  • Figure 65. Test 70 View
  • Figure 66. Test 70 KPIs
  • Figure 67. Test 74 View
  • Figure 68. Test 74 KPIs
  • Figure 69. Test 75 View
  • Figure 70. Test 75 KPIs
  • Figure 71. Test 76 View
  • Figure 72. Test 76 KPIs
  • Figure 73. Across the River Cell Site
  • Figure 74. Test 82 View
  • Figure 75. Test 82 KPIs
  • Figure 76. Test 84 View
  • Figure 77. Test 84 KPIs
  • Figure 78. Test 85 View
  • Figure 79. Test 85 KPIs
  • Figure 80. Test 85 LTE Throughput
  • Figure 81. Test 85 Uplink KPIs
  • Figure 82. Test 85 Downlink Throughput Time Series Plot
  • Figure 83. Test 85 Uplink Throughput Time Series Plot
  • Figure 84. XCAL-M with Smartphone Diagnostics
  • Figure 85. Umetrix Data Architecture