首页 产业/市场分类 出版商一览 Email 通知 GII媒体代理会议 公司简介 联络我们
- English Japanese Korean
首页 > 市场调查报告书 > 生物科技 > 生命科学仪器市场之市场占有率最大化
产业/市场分类
生物科技 (1566)
分子标靶治疗学 (125)
生技设备 (354)
生物材料 (53)
生物标记 (155)
以基因为基之药物开发 (202)
再生医学 (118)
抗体和免疫 (189)
个性化医学 (51)
基因治疗学和RNAi (101)
市场调查报告书

生命科学仪器市场之市场占有率最大化

Maximize Your Share of the Life Science Instrumentation Market

出版商 BioInformatics, LLC
出版日期 2011年06月 商品编码 196607
内容信息 英文  
价格
US $ 3200 Hard Copy
US $ 5200 Hard Copy + PDF by E-mail (Company-wide license)
US $ 5200 PDF by E-mail (Company-wide license)


生命科学仪器市场之市场占有率最大化 是由出版商BioInformatics, LLC在2011年06月所出版的。 这份英文市场调查报告书价格从美金3200起跳。

简介

2009年,分析和生命科学仪器产业市场明显缩小,但景气复苏及政府于本市场之刺激政策,使其获得效果并使市场持续恢复,且多数仪器供应商于2010年有所获利。新兴市场受应用研究增加及更可信赖之高资金调度影响,成为仪器供应商之绝佳机会。

本报告为,汇整生命科学仪器供应商于本市场之优势及劣势、设备差异性手段、品牌策略等,以下列摘要形式阐述。

关于受访者

品牌意识及使用

  • 最优先之品牌
  • 生命科学研究所需之特定品牌及关联性

品牌经验

  • 由多数品牌中加以差别化
  • 过去2年间之品牌差别化趋势
  • 供应企业研究/作业所需仪器之程度
  • 过去2年间供应企业研究/作业所需仪器之程度变化
  • 品牌别仪器表现
  • 过去2年间之品牌别仪器表现变化
  • 品牌欢迎度
  • 过去2年间之品牌欢迎度变化
  • 品牌优势
  • 过去2年间之品牌优势变化
  • 品牌别顾客经验及期待
  • 过去2年间之品牌别顾客经验及期待变化

对品牌产品之满意度

  • 决策购买时最重要及最不重要之品牌特性
  • 对品牌别产品特性之满意度
  • 品牌别整体满意度
  • 推荐可能性

品牌比较

  • 价格别
  • 品质别
  • 说明创新

受访者相关详细信息

  • 初期/后期采用者
  • 职称
  • 研究领域
  • 经验
  • 实验室中选择耗材之人员
  • 实验室中选择设备/仪器之人员
  • 2011年间研究应运之预算
  • 2011年用于设备投资之预算比例
  • 实验室大小

发问

  • 受访者要如何于类似品牌中作决策
  • 绝不买(非目前使用品牌)别设备之唯一理由

目录

Abstract

OVERVIEW

In 2009, the analytical and life science instrument industry suffered a marked decline. Now, in a time of post economic recession, the instrumentation market is experiencing a recovery, attributed in part to government stimulus funding from multiple countries. As funding became available, suppliers enjoyed a slight " bubble;" 2010 yielded an increase in revenues for most of the major instrument suppliers. Emerging markets, the growth of applied research and more reliable funding continue to create opportunities for instrument suppliers, opportunities that had been stalled for over a year. But the competition is fierce, and the initial surge in pent-up funding won' t be sustained. Key factors play into how a laboratory chooses a brand, and suppliers who want to win must demonstrate superior quality, engender customer loyalty and deliver what researchers feel they need to do their work.1

BioInformatics LLC' s June 2011 report, Maximize Your Share of the Life Science Instrumentation Market, was designed to help suppliers identify brand strengths and weaknesses and to provide direction as to how to differentiate instrumentation offerings. This report offers suppliers an unbiased assessment of how major brands are performing compared to their closest competitors. Based upon the opinions of almost 1,500 life scientists worldwide, these insights can help create a " halo" effect surrounding a company' s products creating excitement, allowing for premium pricing and generating goodwill that translates into future sales.

From the perspective of scientific consumers who use, recommend and/or buy instruments, this study analyzes how brands are perceived throughout the industry. Attributes such as brand recognition, popularity, relevance and differentiation are measured, along with the degree of loyalty scientists have toward specific brands of instruments and why. Purchasing criteria is established, likelihood of recommending a brand to colleagues is explored and brands are compared side-by-side with regards to price, innovation and quality. Additionally, this study provides trending research about how major suppliers' brands have been performing over the past 18-24 months.

THIS REPORT WILL HELP YOU TO:

  • Assess the degree of brand recognition, familiarity with and usage of life science instrumentation and equipment brands.
  • Evaluate the brand equity of the life science instrumentation and equipment brands in terms of differentiation, relevance, quality, popularity and advantages
  • Determine whether a brand' s performance across these factors has improved or worsened over the past 18 to 24 months.
  • Establish the most/least important factors considered when purchasing instruments and equipment from different brands.
  • Measure level of satisfaction with a brand' s instrument and equipment offering across multiple attributes.
  • Correlate the likelihood of customers to recommend a brand of life science instrumentation and equipment with satisfaction.
  • Present a customer profile for multiple brands of life science instrumentation and equipment that features the key demographics of each brand' s most loyal and satisfied customers.

Suppliers can use Maximize Your Share of the Life Science Instrumentation Market to power up their brand strategies, to inform more accurate competitive analyses and to identify segments that are vulnerable to switching as a result of brand confusion or lack of differentiation. Plus, included in the report are detailed profiles of major suppliers' brands. Not only do these profiles report on brand health, they also present the key demographics of each brand' s most loyal and satisfied customers.

Maximize Your Share of the Life Science Instrumentation Market contains the most current, comprehensive market research on life science instrumentation brands, and will help suppliers understand how their brands are ranked and how to position their offerings so that they can more aggressively capture market share.

REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

About the Respondents

  • Country, region
  • Institution/company/organization

Brand Awareness and Usage

  • Brands in top-of-mind order
  • Association with identified brands for life science research

Brand Experience

  • Perceived differentiation among brands
  • Perceived trends in differentiation among brands over the last two years
  • Degree in which companies supply equipment needed for research/work
  • Change in degree in which companies supply equipment needed for research/work over the last two years
  • Performance of equipment by brand
  • Change in performance of equipment by brand over last two years
  • Brand popularity
  • Change in brand popularity over the last two years
  • Brand advantages
  • Change in brand advantages over the last two years
  • Customer experience vs. expectations by brand
  • Change in customer experience vs. expectations by brand over the last two years

Satisfaction with a Brand' s Products

  • Most and least important brand attributes when making a purchasing decision
  • Satisfaction with product attributes by brand
  • Overall satisfaction by brand
  • Likelihood of recommendations

Brand Comparisons

  • Brand comparison by price
  • Brand comparison by quality
  • rand comparison by innovation

More on the Respondents

  • Early/late adopter
  • Job Position
  • Areas of research
  • Experience
  • Role in selecting consumables in lab
  • Role in selecting equipment/instrumentation in lab
  • Annual operational research budget for 2011
  • Percent of 2011 budget devoted to capital equipment
  • Size of lab

Free Text Questions

  • How respondents decide between what they perceive as nearly identical brands
  • " The only reason I would NEVER buy another instrument from (currently used brand) is if..."
Back to Top