首页 产业/市场分类 出版商一览 Email 通知 GII媒体代理会议 公司简介 联络我们
- English Japanese Korean
首页 > 市场调查报告书 > 制药 > 药物开发 > 新药早期研发阶段及新药开发阶段的企业联盟
产业/市场分类
制药 (4823)
肥胖症治疗 (44)
非专利药 (129)
疫苗 (181)
神经疾病 (172)
骨头疾病治疗 (37)
动物用医药 (18)
处方药 (156)
规章 (130)
感染疾病 (347)
精神病 (85)
制药企业 (526)
糖尿病 (191)
癌症 (903)
药物开发 (1458)
DDS (182)
OTC 非处方药 (150)
市场调查报告书

新药早期研发阶段及新药开发阶段的企业联盟

Early Stage and Discovery Deals: Strategy, Structure and Payment Terms 2nd Edition

出版商 Pharmalicensing Ltd.
出版日期 2006年12月 商品编码 47828
内容信息 英文 144 pages
价格
US $ 2695 PDF by E-mail (Single User License)


新药早期研发阶段及新药开发阶段的企业联盟 是由出版商Pharmalicensing Ltd.在2006年12月所出版的。 这份英文市场调查报告书包含144 pages 价格从美金2695起跳。

简介

新药早期研发阶段的企业联盟对生物科技企业及制药企业而言是策略的重要部份,因为企业联盟将有效开拓新药及技术发展的道路。为了在生命科学产业中取得成功,掌握该产业中早期阶段的交易趋势变化就变得非常重要。

在制药、生物科技及医疗照护领域获得一定评价的英国顾问公司 Pharmalicensing (总公司:英国莱斯特郡),针对新药早期研发阶段及新药开发阶段的企业联盟进行详细的调查分析,并出版系统整理之报告书 "Early Stage and Discovery Deals: Strategy, Structure and Payment Terms 2nd Edition" 。

本报告书内容包括:以Amgen AstraZeneca、GlaxoSmithKline等企业为首的2006年个案研究特集、早期研发阶段的全面性交易趋势、详细的契约内容等。包括图表共计144页的内容纲要摘记如下:

实施概要

第1章 序章

第2章 早期阶段的企业联盟有什么好处

  • 企业策略中联盟的角色
    • 授权的优势
    • 取得授权:赋予专利即将到期的药物新的生命
  • 取得授权的产品收益预计将以年率10%的速度成长
  • 与产品线药物开发相关的企业联盟

第3章 授权及企业联盟

  • 从授权到企业联盟
  • 传统的授权模式
  • 从单纯的业务合作转变到复杂的企业联盟协定
  • 从风险及报酬分配面来看,谁是真正的受惠者
  • 与利益分配相关的知识是交易结构中的重要部分
  • 企业联盟模式给我们的启发
  • 复杂的企业联盟模式
    • 过程
    • 成功的交易方式
    • 财务面须考量的事项
  • 朝早期阶段交易切换
    • 生物科技企业与制药企业的竞争

第4章 早期阶段的交易策略及结构

  • 成功的授权
  • 企业在什么时候会变成合作夥伴
    • 谁是早期阶段授权的受惠者
    • 后来的授权:虽然安全性更高,但是费用增加
  • 早期及晚期阶段的交易:费用比较
    • 企业花费多少在企业联盟上,又如何成功执行授权计画呢?
  • 同为生物科技企业间的联盟
  • 预付:交易结构的重要部份
  • 大学的对外授权为什么安排在早期计画中执行呢?
  • 授权策略个案研究
  • 交易的种类

第5章 付款策略

  • 策略之决定
  • 付款方式
    • 预付
    • 贷款
    • 可转换公司债
    • 股票
    • 对研发的资金援助
    • 每年支付固定费用
    • 目标达成奖励金
    • 创新的付款方式
    • 权利金
    • 其他

第6章 适当的交易方式

  • 建立交易关系
  • 选择适当的合作夥伴
  • 联盟时间表
  • 交易的价値衡量
  • 成功交易
  • 什么时候交涉要终止契约?
  • 何谓具报导价值的交易

第7章 交易条件:早期阶段的交易分析

附录

目录

Abstract

Today early-stage partnering is a core component of both biotech and pharmaceutical business strategy, allowing companies to access promising new and emerging compounds and technologies. To become a successful player within the life science industry it is crucial to understand the changing dynamics of the industry' s early stage deal-making trends.

Pharmalicensing' s revised second edition of "Early Stage and Discovery Deals: Strategy, Structure and Payment Terms" analyzes the early stage dealmaking trends and discusses the basics of dealmaking structures, covering payments terms and deal valuations.

Updated with new data including case studies from 2006 and contracts this report aims to assist and guide leading professionals involved in business development through the complex process of early stage dealmaking.

Order this report to

  • Discover the benefits of early stage partnering
  • Examine the current partnering model
  • Uncover ways to find the right partner
  • Accumulate tips for structuring and maintaining the right deal
  • Understand the cost differences between in-licensed projects and in-house pre-clinical projects

Report sections include

  • Extensive selections of case studies from 2006, featuring companies such as Amgen AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline
  • A Comprehensive presentation of headline deal values at different phases of early stage development
  • Detailed company contracts, highlighting real values and information

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Executive summary

Executive summary

1. Introduction

2. What are the benefits of early-stage partnering?

  • 2.1. The role of partnering in corporate strategy
    • 2.1.1. What are the benefits of out-licensing?
    • 2.1.2. In-licensing: A way of giving an off-patent drug a new life
  • 2.2. The revenue from in-licensed products is predicted to have an annual growth rate of 10%
  • 2.3. Partnering for pipeline development
    • 2.3.1 One company' s tactics: GlaxoSmithKline' s approach to in-licensing
  • 3.1. Licensing to partnering
  • 3.2. The traditional licensing model
  • 3.3. The transition from straight-forward transactional exchanges to complex partnering agreements
  • 3.4. Who benefits from the risk and reward sharing?
  • 3.5. Sharing knowledge is a big part of the deal structure
  • 3.6. What does the partnering model teach us?
  • 3.7. Complex partnering models
    • 3.7.1. Process
    • 3.7.2. How to structure a successful deal
    • 3.7.3. Financing - What aspects should be considered?
  • 3.8. A shift in early stage dealmaking
    • 3.8.1. Biotechs competing with pharma for deals

4. Early-stage deal strategies and structures

  • 4.1 Successful out-licensing
  • 4.2. When do companies partner?
    • 4.2.1. Who benefits from early stage licensing?
    • 4.2.2. License late: A safer but more costly avenue for the licensee
  • 4.3. Early and late-stage deals - a cost comparison
    • 4.3.1. What do companies spend on partnering and how successful are the in-licensed projects?
    • 4.4.1. Alliances between biotechnology companies are taking over
      • Case study 4.1 - MedImmune / Infinity Pharmaceuticals
      • Case study 4.2 - PTC Therapeutics / CV Therapeutics
      • Case study 4.3 - Predix Pharmaceuticals / Amgen Inc
      • Case study 4.4 - Medtronic / RVX Therapeutics
      • Case study 4.5 - Enzon Pharmaceuticals / Santaris Pharma
    • 4.4.2. Upfront payment: An important part of the deal structure
      • See case study 4.1 - MedImmune / Infinity Pharmaceuticals
      • Case study 4.6 - GlaxoSmithKline / ChemoCentryx
      • Case study 4.7 - Infinity Pharmaceuticals / Novartis
    • 4.4.3. Why is University out-licensing associated with very early-stage projects?
      • Case study 4.8 - National Institutes of Health (NIH) / Regeneron
      • Case study 4.9 - GlaxoSmithKline / Alimentary Pharmabiotic Centre
      • Case study 4.10 - Biota / NIAID
      • Case study 4.11 - Cystic Fibrosis Foundation / Vertex Pharmaceuticals
  • 4.5. Licensing strategy case studies
    • Case study 4.12 - Crucell / Immunobiological Laboratories Co Ltd
    • Case study 4.13 - Galapagos / Cellzome
    • Case study 4.14 - Memory Pharmaceuticals
    • Case study 4.15 - Caprion Pharmaceuticals / Boehringer Ingelheim
    • Case study 4.16 - Cambridge Antibody Technology / AstraZeneca
    • Case study 4.17 - Biorigen / New Life Scientific
    • Case study 4.18 - GTC Biotherapeutics / LFB Biotechnologies
  • 4.6. Deal types

5. Payment strategies

  • 5.1. Deciding a strategy
  • 5.2. Payment options
    • 5.2.1. Upfront payments
      • 5.2.1.1. Conditionality of upfront payments
    • 5.3.2. Loans
    • 5.3.3. Convertible loans
    • 5.3.4. Equity
    • 5.3.5. R&D funding
    • 5.3.6. Annual fixed payments
    • 5.3.7. Milestone payments
    • 5.3.8. Innovative forms of payment - ' quids'
      • 5.3.8.1. Products
      • 5.3.8.2. Extended rights to pipeline/technology
      • 5.3.8.3. Benefit from skills transfer
      • 5.3.8.4. Public relations - An important factor for the early-stage company
      • 5.3.8.5. Other quids
    • 5.3.9. Royalties
      • 5.3.9.1. Issues affecting royalty rates
      • 5.3.9.2 Royalties on combination products
        • Case study 5.1 - Elan Corporation plc / Abbott Pharmaceutical PR Ltd
      • 5.3.9.3. Guaranteed minimum/maximum annual payments
      • 5.3.9.4. Royalty stacking
      • 5.3.9.5. Royalties and supply/purchase contracts
    • 5.3.10. Option payments

6. How to make the right deal

  • 6.1. Constructing the deal
  • 6.2. Finding the right partner
    • 6.2.1. What attracts a partner?
    • 6.2.2. Where to look for a partner
    • 6.2.3. Sources of information
    • 6.2.4. Building a network
      • 6.2.4.1. Early-stage networking events
      • 6.2.4.2. Networking for early biopharmaceutical executives
    • 6.2.5. Becoming partner of choice
  • 6.3. Deal timeframes
  • 6.4. Deal valuation
    • 6.4.1. Factors contributing to the deal valuation
      • 6.4.1.1. Intellectual property
      • 6.4.1.2. Development phase
      • 6.4.1.3. Cost of clinical trials
      • 6.4.1.4. Risks associated with commercializing too late
      • 6.4.1.5. Benchmark values
      • 6.4.1.6. Preclinical/clinical data
      • 6.4.1.7. Risk of failure
      • 6.4.1.8. Size and value of therapeutic market
      • 6.4.1.9. Competition for licensing rights
      • 6.4.1.10. Partner' s expertise/reputation in given field
      • 6.4.1.11. Impact on internal R&D programs
    • 6.4.2. Due diligence as a valuation tool
  • 6.5. Keeping a deal successful
    • 6.5.1. Commitment to the deal
    • 6.5.2. Know your partner
    • 6.5.3. Thorough due diligence
    • 6.5.4. Patent and IP management
    • 6.5.5. Comprehensive deal agreement
    • 6.5.6. Feasible and achievable milestones
    • 6.5.7. Proactive management of issues
    • 6.5.8. Regular communication
    • 6.5.9. Tracking of payments and royalties
  • 6.6. When to negotiate termination
  • 6.7. What makes a deal ' newsworthy' ?

7. Deal terms and trends - An analysis of early stage deals

  • 7.1. Why are deal-terms put in the public domain?
  • 7.2. Does survey data reflect the real deal?
  • 7.3. Headline valuations
  • 7.5. Components of the deal

Appendix 1 - Glossary of terms

Appendix 2 - Resources

Appendix 3 - Complex deal terms: an outline

Appendix 4 - Press releases

  • Case Study 4.1
  • Case study 4.2
  • Case study 4.3
  • Case study 4.4
  • Case study 4.5
  • Case study 4.6
  • Case study 4.7
  • Case study 4.8
  • Case study 4.9
  • Case study 4.10
  • Case study 4.11
  • Case study 4.12
  • Case study 4.13
  • Case study 4.15
  • Case study 4.16
  • Case study 4.17
  • Case study 4.18
  • Case study 5.1

Appendix 5 - References

Appendix 6 - Biographies

  • Acknowledgements
  • Pharmalicensing
  • Pharmalicensing Order Form

List of Tables

  • Table 1. GSK' s - Centers of Excellence for Drug Discovery consists of 7 individual centres. 13Table 2. R&D project mathematical valuation models need to be more complex in order to reflect reality.
  • Table 3. Big pharmas dealmaking trends show that they prefer to invest in similar development stages.
  • Table 5. The top 5 deal values in Jan 2006 - Oct 2006 combined reached a total of more than $US 1.6 billion.
  • Table 6. Top 5 upfront payments between Jan-2006 and Oct-2006.
  • Table 7. The top 5 valued University deals, Jan-2006 to Oct-2006.
  • Table 8. A summary of different deal types.
  • Table 8. Payment strategies - components of the deal
  • Table 9. Variants affecting royalty payments
  • Table 11. Attributes that attract partners
  • Table 11. Major early-stage partnering events
  • Table 12. A selection of networking clubs worldwide
  • Table 14. Early stage deals deal frames - from contact to signature
  • Table 15. Factors contributing to deal valuation
  • Table 16. Ongoing due diligence to keep a deal successful
  • Table 17. A preclinical project is worth significantly less than a phase I or phase II project.

List of Figures

  • Figure 1. Amount raised from partnering 1980-2005. 7
  • Figure 2. Between Jan 2006 - Oct 2006, 6 early stage deals were valued at over $US 100 million.
  • Figure 3. Deals disclosing upfront payments between Jan 2006-Oct 2006.
  • Figure 4. The values of University deals are significantly lower than biotech deals between Jan 2006 and Oct 2006.
  • Figure 6. Key information sources for partnering executives
  • Figure 7. Lead Molecule R&D projects have increased most in value Jan. 2003 to Oct. 2006.
  • Figure 8. Breakdown of discovery deals from 2003 to October 2006*
  • Figure 9. Breakdown of lead discovery deals from 2003 to October 2006*
  • Figure 10. Preclinical deals from 2003 to October 2006*
  • Figure 11. Average total upfront payments by stage of development at deal closing ($ million)
  • Figure 13. Average royalty rates by stage of development at deal closing (%)
Back to Top